Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Mitchell Cary Tilner · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Mitchell Cary Tilner is on California’s State Bar roll, #93023, admitted in 1980; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Burbank, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 6 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 6 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #93023 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1980 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | Horvitz & Levy LLP |
| Location | Burbank, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson v. Raytheon Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 33 Cal. App. 5th 617 | California Court of Appeal | 8 March 2019 |
| Victaulic Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 20 Cal. App. 5th 948 | California Court of Appeal | 26 February 2018 |
| City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation District | Counsel for the appellant | 3 Cal. 5th 1191 | California Supreme Court | 4 December 2017 |
| Vasilenko v. Grace Family Church | Counsel for the respondent | 3 Cal. 5th 1077 | California Supreme Court | 13 November 2017 |
| Foremost Ins. Co. Grand Rapids v. Jimmy Enriquez | Counsel for the respondent | 679 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 February 2017 |
| Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 1 Cal. 5th 1024 | California Supreme Court | 21 November 2016 |
| Morlin Asset Management LP v. Murachanian | Counsel for the appellant | 2 Cal. App. 5th 184 | California Court of Appeal | 8 August 2016 |
| Quoc Viet Foods, Inc. v. VV Foods, LLC | Counsel for the defendant | 192 F. Supp. 3d 1067 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 June 2016 |
| JMR Construction Corp. v. Environmental Assessment & Remediation Management, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 243 Cal. App. 4th 571 | California Court of Appeal | 30 December 2015 |
| Big 5 Sporting Goods Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 635 F. App'x 351 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 December 2015 |
| Transbay Auto Service, Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 807 F.3d 1113 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2015 |
| Sheridan v. Touchstone Television Productions, LLC | Counsel for the respondent | 241 Cal. App. 4th 508 | California Court of Appeal | 20 October 2015 |
| Rejeanne Bernier v. Travelers Property Casualty In | Counsel for the respondent | 626 F. App'x 666 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 September 2015 |
| Debra Foli v. Metro. Water Dist. of S. Cal. | Counsel for the respondent | 592 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2015 |
| Aghaian v. Minassian | Counsel for the appellant | 234 Cal. App. 4th 427 | California Court of Appeal | 17 February 2015 |
| Adams v. MHC Colony Park Ltd. Partnership | Counsel for the respondent | 224 Cal. App. 4th 601 | California Court of Appeal | 10 March 2014 |
| Pedeferri v. Seidner Enterprises | Counsel for the respondent | 216 Cal. App. 4th 359 | California Court of Appeal | 15 May 2013 |
| Celador International, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 499 F. App'x 721 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2012 |
| Michael Taylor Designs, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America | Counsel for the appellant | 495 F. App'x 830 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2012 |
| Cadam v. Somerset Gardens Townhouse HOA | Counsel for the appellant | 200 Cal. App. 4th 383 | California Court of Appeal | 28 September 2011 |
| PacifiCare of California v. Bright Medical Associates, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 198 Cal. App. 4th 1451 | California Court of Appeal | 2 September 2011 |
| Martin v. PacifiCare of California | Counsel for the respondent | 198 Cal. App. 4th 1390 | California Court of Appeal | 31 August 2011 |
| Behnke v. State Farm General Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 196 Cal. App. 4th 1443 | California Court of Appeal | 31 May 2011 |
| Bradley Ausmus v. Lexington Insurance Company | Counsel for the defendant | 414 F. App'x 76 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 February 2011 |
| Scie LLC v. Xl Reinsurance America, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 397 F. App'x 348 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 September 2010 |
| Uzyel v. Kadisha | Counsel for the appellant | 188 Cal. App. 4th 866 | California Court of Appeal | 22 September 2010 |
| Love v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 611 F.3d 601 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 July 2010 |
| Association of California Insurance Companies v. Poizner | Counsel for the appellant | 180 Cal. App. 4th 1029 | California Court of Appeal | 30 December 2009 |
| Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. County of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 347 F. App'x 315 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 October 2009 |
| Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. County of San Bernardino | Counsel for the appellant | 347 F. App'x 315 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 October 2009 |
| Griffin Dewatering Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York | Counsel for the appellant | 176 Cal. App. 4th 172 | California Court of Appeal | 31 July 2009 |
| PSM Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 339 F. App'x 693 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2009 |
| PSM Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 339 F. App'x 693 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2009 |
| State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 164 Cal. App. 4th 317 | California Court of Appeal | 9 July 2008 |
| Bouton v. USAA Casualty Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 43 Cal. 4th 1190 | California Supreme Court | 9 June 2008 |
| George S. Chen Corp. v. Cadona International, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 266 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 January 2008 |
| Walker v. Farmers Insurance Exchange | Counsel for the appellant | 153 Cal. App. 4th 965 | California Court of Appeal | 27 June 2007 |
| Nasd Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of the State of California | Counsel for the respondent | 488 F.3d 1065 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 May 2007 |
| Safeco Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 148 Cal. App. 4th 620 | California Court of Appeal | 14 March 2007 |
| Prince v. United National Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 142 Cal. App. 4th 233 | California Court of Appeal | 24 August 2006 |
| Calfarm Insurance v. Krusiewicz | Counsel for the appellant | 131 Cal. App. 4th 273 | California Court of Appeal | 28 June 2005 |
| Beneficial Standard Life Insurance v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 137 F. App'x 9 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 June 2005 |
| Romano v. Mercury Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 128 Cal. App. 4th 1333 | California Court of Appeal | 27 May 2005 |
| Osborn v. Leader Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 129 F. App'x 379 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 April 2005 |
| Contessa Food Products Inc. v. Lockpur Fish Processing Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 123 F. App'x 747 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 January 2005 |
| Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. v. Pomona Unified School District | Counsel for the appellant | 34 Cal. 4th 960 | California Supreme Court | 23 December 2004 |
| Laguna Beach County Water District v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 124 Cal. App. 4th 1453 | California Court of Appeal | 15 December 2004 |
| Textron Financial Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 118 Cal. App. 4th 1061 | California Court of Appeal | 18 June 2004 |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Garamendi | Counsel for the appellant | 32 Cal. 4th 1029 | California Supreme Court | 9 June 2004 |
| Haynes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange | Counsel for the respondent | 32 Cal. 4th 1198 | California Supreme Court | 17 May 2004 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 2, Insurance: Insurer (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Horvitz & Levy LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Horvitz & Levy LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at horvitzlevy.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1980 · 46 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Burbank, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Mitchell Cary Tilner’s license status, bar number #93023, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records