Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Morgan Chu · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Morgan Chu is on California’s State Bar roll, #70446, admitted in 1976; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 11 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 21 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 8 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 8 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #70446 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1976 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Firm | Irell & Manella LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P.P. v. Compton Unified School District | Counsel for the plaintiff | 135 F. Supp. 3d 1098 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 September 2015 |
| Linear Technology Corp. v. Tokyo Electron Ltd. | Counsel for the respondent | 200 Cal. App. 4th 1527 | California Court of Appeal | 22 November 2011 |
| City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 43 Cal. 4th 375 | California Supreme Court | 24 April 2008 |
| Business Office Inc. v. Golisano | Counsel for the respondent | 275 F. App'x 578 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 2008 |
| Business Office Inc. v. Golisano | Counsel for the respondent | 274 F. App'x 541 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 2008 |
| MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 535 F. Supp. 2d 1000 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 February 2008 |
| MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 535 F. Supp. 2d 1020 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 10 January 2008 |
| Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 152 Cal. App. 4th 115 | California Court of Appeal | 18 June 2007 |
| Sharper Image Corp. v. Target Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 425 F. Supp. 2d 1056 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 March 2006 |
| Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 333 F. Supp. 2d 858 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 July 2004 |
| Competitive Technologies v. Fujitsu Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 286 F. Supp. 2d 1161 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 August 2003 |
| Affymetrix, Inc. v. Hyseq, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 132 F. Supp. 2d 1212 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 January 2001 |
| INCYTE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. Affymetrix, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 131 F. Supp. 2d 1154 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 September 2000 |
| MacRovision Corp. v. Dwight Cavendish Developments Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 105 F. Supp. 2d 1070 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 June 2000 |
| Hamid v. Waterhouse | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2500 | California Supreme Court | 7 April 1995 |
| Hamid v. Waterhouse | Counsel for the respondent | 51 F.3d 1411 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 1995 |
| Mirkin v. Wasserman | Counsel for the respondent | 5 Cal. 4th 1082 | California Supreme Court | 9 September 1993 |
| Elan Transdermal Ltd. v. Cygnus Therapeutic Systems | Counsel for the plaintiff | 809 F. Supp. 1383 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 November 1992 |
| Getty v. Getty | Counsel for the appellant | 187 Cal. App. 3d 1159 | California Court of Appeal | 12 December 1986 |
| Currie Medical Specialties, Inc. v. Bowen | Counsel for the appellant | 136 Cal. App. 3d 774 | California Court of Appeal | 20 October 1982 |
| Mattel, Inc. v. Gilbert P. Hyatt, Mattel, Inc. v. Gilbert P. Hyatt | Counsel for the respondent | 664 F.2d 757 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 1981 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers Global 2026, Band 1, Intellectual Property: Patent (USA). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 6 October 2026.
Chambers Global 2026, Band 1, Litigation: Trial Lawyers (USA). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 6 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Senior Statespeople, Intellectual Property (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Senior Statespeople, Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Senior Statespeople, Life Sciences: IP/Patent Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Senior Statespeople, Litigation: Trial Lawyers (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Irell & Manella LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Irell & Manella LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at irell.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1976 · 50 years on the roll.
11 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
21 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Morgan Chu’s license status, bar number #70446, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records