Attorney RecordSan Mateo County
Nadeem H. Makada · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Nadeem H. Makada is on California’s State Bar roll, #182736, admitted in 1996; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Burlingame, San Mateo County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Immigration, Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a immigration matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #182736 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1996 |
| Law school | Univ of Colorado SOL |
| Firm | Law Ofc Nadeem Makada |
| Location | Burlingame, San Mateo County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 541 F. App'x 746 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2013 |
| Antonio Salazar Montiel v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 504 F. App'x 601 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 January 2013 |
| Mariano Ramirez-Pablo v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 489 F. App'x 210 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 December 2012 |
| Zhenshui Duan v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 470 F. App'x 643 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2012 |
| Fernando Lopez-Vazquez v. Eric Holder, Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 444 F. App'x 215 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 July 2011 |
| Hernandez Bocanegra v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 434 F. App'x 705 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 May 2011 |
| Reyes-Velazquez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 411 F. App'x 95 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2011 |
| Hernandez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 404 F. App'x 156 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 November 2010 |
| Siknaber Pawal v. Eric H. Holder Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 398 F. App'x 209 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2010 |
| Arango-Gonzalez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 388 F. App'x 610 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2010 |
| Angelica Martinez v. Eric H. Holder Jr. | Counsel for the petitioner | 388 F. App'x 604 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2010 |
| Izquierdo-herrera v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 380 F. App'x 710 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 June 2010 |
| Larios v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 362 F. App'x 781 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 January 2010 |
| Chavez Lozoya v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 358 F. App'x 919 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2009 |
| Chavez Lozoya v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 358 F. App'x 919 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2009 |
| Moya-Garcia v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 340 F. App'x 362 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2009 |
| Moya-Garcia v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 340 F. App'x 362 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2009 |
| Hernandez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 315 F. App'x 628 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2009 |
| Hernandez v. Holder | Counsel for the petitioner | 315 F. App'x 628 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2009 |
| Morfin v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 304 F. App'x 478 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 2008 |
| Morfin v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 304 F. App'x 478 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 2008 |
| Licea v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 302 F. App'x 599 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 2008 |
| Bijarro v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 301 F. App'x 588 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2008 |
| Garcia v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 287 F. App'x 566 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 July 2008 |
| Maldonado v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 268 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2008 |
| Fuentes-Rojas v. Keisler | Counsel for the petitioner | 249 F. App'x 680 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 October 2007 |
| Michel v. Keisler | Counsel for the petitioner | 249 F. App'x 573 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 2007 |
| Sandoval v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 243 F. App'x 323 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 September 2007 |
| Vazquez-Avila v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 246 F. App'x 517 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 August 2007 |
| Galvez v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 237 F. App'x 240 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 June 2007 |
| Luna v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 237 F. App'x 201 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 June 2007 |
| Macias v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 229 F. App'x 625 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 April 2007 |
| Quinones v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 229 F. App'x 620 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 April 2007 |
| Ramirez v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 229 F. App'x 590 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 April 2007 |
| Medina Segovia v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 229 F. App'x 577 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 April 2007 |
| Lizardi v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 229 F. App'x 467 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 2007 |
| Herrera-Molina v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 227 F. App'x 688 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 2007 |
| Velasco v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 219 F. App'x 705 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 January 2007 |
| Vargas v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 210 F. App'x 686 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 2006 |
| Pech v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 196 F. App'x 554 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 August 2006 |
| Castro v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 192 F. App'x 661 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 July 2006 |
| Arroyo v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 184 F. App'x 625 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 2006 |
| Roberto Ferrer Miranda Alvarado Madeleine Janet Morales Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | Counsel for the petitioner | 449 F.3d 915 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2006 |
| Roberto Ferrer Miranda Alvarado Madeleine Janet Morales Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | Counsel for the petitioner | 441 F.3d 750 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2006 |
| Arroyo v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 158 F. App'x 868 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2005 |
| Hernandez v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 138 F. App'x 984 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 July 2005 |
| Palomino Ochoa v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 125 F. App'x 874 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 April 2005 |
| Ferreyra-Jacobo v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 117 F. App'x 602 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2004 |
| Archila v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 105 F. App'x 949 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 2004 |
| Erostico v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the petitioner | 107 F. App'x 102 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2004 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Ofc Nadeem Makada.
The law school on the record is University of Colorado School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1996 · 30 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Immigration, Personal Injury and Workers' Compensation.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Burlingame, in San Mateo County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, seated at Redwood City.
Confirm Nadeem H. Makada’s license status, bar number #182736, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Immigration in San Mateo County: next on the roll
San Mateo County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records