Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Nathaniel P. Garrett · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Nathaniel P. Garrett is on California’s State Bar roll, #248211, admitted in 2007; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. 22 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #248211 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2007 |
| Law school | Stanford Univ Law School |
| Firm | Jones Day |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Languages
These are signals observed from the firm's public website, not a statement by the attorney. Confirm language access directly with the office before retaining counsel. Language listings describe access, not ability or results. Browse attorneys by language →
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courthouse News Serv. v. Yamasaki | Counsel for the defendant | 312 F. Supp. 3d 844 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 9 May 2018 |
| Heller Ehrman LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 4 Cal. 5th 467 | California Supreme Court | 5 March 2018 |
| Applied Med. Corp. v. Thomas | Counsel for the appellant | 10 Cal. App. 5th 927 | California Court of Appeal | 12 April 2017 |
| Synopsys, Inc. v. ATopTech, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 319 F.R.D. 293 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 November 2016 |
| United States v. Tyrone Davis | Counsel for the appellant | 825 F.3d 1014 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 June 2016 |
| Natalia Sidiakina v. James Bertoli | Counsel for the respondent | 612 F. App'x 477 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 September 2015 |
| Brenda Miles v. David Wesley | Counsel for the respondent | 801 F.3d 1060 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 September 2015 |
| Denise Edwards v. the First American Corp | Counsel for the respondent | 798 F.3d 1172 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 August 2015 |
| Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet | Counsel for the defendant | 614 F. App'x 912 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2015 |
| Nolte v. Cedars Sinai Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 236 Cal. App. 4th 1401 | California Court of Appeal | 21 May 2015 |
| Lennar Homes of California, Inc. v. Stephens | Counsel for the appellant | 232 Cal. App. 4th 673 | California Court of Appeal | 18 December 2014 |
| Waters v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 417 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2014 |
| B. Waters v. Hollywood Tow Service, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 408 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2014 |
| B. Benedict Waters v. Juan Casas | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 401 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2014 |
| United States v. LUCIANA HARMATH | Counsel for the appellant | 580 F. App'x 591 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2014 |
| United States v. Gale Young | Counsel for the appellant | 571 F. App'x 558 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2014 |
| Courthouse News Service v. Michael Planet | Counsel for the respondent | 750 F.3d 776 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 2014 |
| Costa Mesa City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Costa Mesa | Counsel for the appellant | 209 Cal. App. 4th 298 | California Court of Appeal | 17 August 2012 |
| Heller Ehrman LLP v. Arnold & Porter, LLP (In re Heller Ehrman LLP) | Counsel for the defendant | 464 B.R. 348 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 December 2011 |
| Maya v. Centex Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 658 F.3d 1060 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 September 2011 |
| Jeffrey Duvardo v. George Giurbino | Counsel for the appellant | 410 F. App'x 69 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 January 2011 |
| Joaquin Ciria v. Nicholas Rubino | Counsel for the appellant | 394 F. App'x 400 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2010 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 4, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Jones Day.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
Language information is listed below with its attorney, staff or website source.
The employer on the official record is Jones Day.
A firm or employer website answers at jonesday.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Stanford University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2007 · 19 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
22 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Nathaniel P. Garrett’s license status, bar number #248211, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records