Attorney RecordCivil Rights · San Francisco County
Neah Huynh · Civil Rights Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Neah Huynh is on California’s State Bar roll, #235377, admitted in 2005; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law, Civil Rights and Constitutional Law. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a civil rights matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #235377 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 2005 |
| Law school | Lewis & Clark Coll |
| Firm | California Attorney General -- DOJ |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith v. Ogbuehi | Counsel for the respondent | 38 Cal. App. 5th 453 | California Court of Appeal | 6 August 2019 |
| Kevin Andres v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 854 F.3d 1103 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 April 2017 |
| Andres v. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 867 F.3d 1076 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 April 2017 |
| Timothy Watts v. H. Nguyen | Counsel for the respondent | 671 F. App'x 444 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 November 2016 |
| Tony Asberry v. Matthew Cate | Counsel for the respondent | 645 F. App'x 603 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2016 |
| Tilei v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation | Counsel for the defendant | 644 F. App'x 758 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2016 |
| James Takechi v. G. Adame | Counsel for the respondent | 635 F. App'x 377 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 March 2016 |
| Billy Birdwell, II v. Matthew Cate | Counsel for the respondent | 623 F. App'x 884 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 November 2015 |
| James McBride v. S. Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 807 F.3d 982 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2015 |
| Jimmy McDonald v. Greg Clark | Counsel for the respondent | 606 F. App'x 418 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2015 |
| James McBride v. S. Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 791 F.3d 1115 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 June 2015 |
| Philip Rosati v. Dr. Igbinoso | Counsel for the respondent | 791 F.3d 1037 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 June 2015 |
| Dennis Sharkey v. Eral O'Neal | Counsel for the respondent | 778 F.3d 767 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 2015 |
| Dorian Davis v. E. Flores | Counsel for the respondent | 592 F. App'x 569 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 January 2015 |
| Andre Boston v. v. Garcia | Counsel for the respondent | 588 F. App'x 710 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2014 |
| David Maddox v. A. Battle | Counsel for the defendant | 585 F. App'x 527 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2014 |
| Shaun Garland v. D. Lewis | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 392 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 October 2014 |
| Barry Jameson v. Perry | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 421 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 2014 |
| Garrison Johnson v. Jeffrey Beard | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 413 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2014 |
| Lee Quillar v. Rick Hill | Counsel for the respondent | 582 F. App'x 736 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 July 2014 |
| Coleman v. Brown | Counsel for the defendant | 28 F. Supp. 3d 1068 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 10 April 2014 |
| Jose Rodriguez v. C. Wu | Counsel for the defendant | 564 F. App'x 315 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 March 2014 |
| Arvie Carroll v. K. Dutra | Counsel for the respondent | 564 F. App'x 327 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 March 2014 |
| Michael Yocom v. Randy Grounds | Counsel for the respondent | 563 F. App'x 573 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 March 2014 |
| Emelito Exmundo v. R. Kane | Counsel for the respondent | 553 F. App'x 742 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2014 |
| Raymond Manzanillo v. Francisco Jacquez | Counsel for the respondent | 555 F. App'x 651 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2014 |
| Tommy Brown v. G. Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 538 F. App'x 825 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2013 |
| Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Gomez | Counsel for the respondent | 536 F. App'x 745 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 August 2013 |
| Alberto Winffel v. A. Pomazal | Counsel for the respondent | 517 F. App'x 566 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 2013 |
| Gregory Norwood v. Steve Vance | Counsel for the respondent | 517 F. App'x 557 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 2013 |
| Coleman v. Brown | Counsel for the defendant | 938 F. Supp. 2d 955 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 5 April 2013 |
| Dwayne Eichler v. Mark Nessenson | Counsel for the defendant | 509 F. App'x 638 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2013 |
| Ronald Martinez v. L. Scribner | Counsel for the respondent | 503 F. App'x 550 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2013 |
| Ramon Murillo v. Charles Dudley | Counsel for the respondent | 507 F. App'x 651 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Goldyn Cooper v. Dion | Counsel for the respondent | 507 F. App'x 672 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Byron Johnson v. David Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 507 F. App'x 675 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Will Palmer v. G. Salazar | Counsel for the respondent | 498 F. App'x 721 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2012 |
| Thurston McAfee v. J. Rivero | Counsel for the respondent | 491 F. App'x 826 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2012 |
| Esau Rogers v. S. Rivas | Counsel for the respondent | 486 F. App'x 648 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 October 2012 |
| Morales v. Pelican Bay State Prison | Counsel for the respondent | 481 F. App'x 393 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 September 2012 |
| David Lancaster v. Tom Carey | Counsel for the appellant | 482 F. App'x 301 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 September 2012 |
| Marcus Ellington v. D. Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 479 F. App'x 762 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2012 |
| Donnie Phillips v. Timothy Turmezei | Counsel for the respondent | 474 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2012 |
| Daniel Masterson v. Rosanne Campbell | Counsel for the respondent | 472 F. App'x 801 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 April 2012 |
| Davy Pough v. N. Grannis | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 801 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 March 2012 |
| Robert Jenkins v. Cortez | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 797 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 March 2012 |
| Devonte Harris v. Mike Gardner | Counsel for the respondent | 471 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2012 |
| Daniel Smith v. Figeroe | Counsel for the defendant | 456 F. App'x 694 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 November 2011 |
| John Catanzarite v. R. Horel | Counsel for the respondent | 453 F. App'x 723 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 October 2011 |
| John Smith v. John Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 453 F. App'x 714 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 October 2011 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is California Attorney General -- DOJ.
The law school on the record is Lewis & Clark College.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2005 · 21 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law, Civil Rights and Constitutional Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Neah Huynh’s license status, bar number #235377, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Civil Rights in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records