Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Peter A. Binkow · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Peter A. Binkow is on California’s State Bar roll, #173848, admitted in 1994; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 21 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #173848 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1994 |
| Law school | USC Law School |
| Firm | Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 285 F.R.D. 560 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 July 2012 |
| Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 875 F. Supp. 2d 1096 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 July 2012 |
| Snellink v. Gulf Resources, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 870 F. Supp. 2d 930 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 15 May 2012 |
| Ralph Shaffer v. Continental Casualty Company | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 627 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 January 2010 |
| In Re Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 654 F. Supp. 2d 1037 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 September 2009 |
| In Re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 639 F. Supp. 2d 1038 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 16 July 2009 |
| In Re Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 554 F. Supp. 2d 1083 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 19 May 2008 |
| Query v. MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 558 F. Supp. 2d 969 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 May 2008 |
| Miller v. Thane International, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 519 F.3d 879 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 March 2008 |
| Miller v. Thane International, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 508 F.3d 910 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 November 2007 |
| New Mexico State Investment Council v. United States District Court for Central District of California | Counsel for the petitioner | 250 F. App'x 225 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2007 |
| In Re Syncor International Corp. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 327 F. Supp. 2d 1149 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 July 2004 |
| Wietschner v. Monterey Pasta Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 294 F. Supp. 2d 1102 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 November 2003 |
| In Re Calpine Corporation Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 288 F. Supp. 2d 1054 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 28 August 2003 |
| In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 223 F. Supp. 2d 1153 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 August 2002 |
| In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 223 F. Supp. 2d 1142 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 August 2002 |
| Dalarne Partners, Ltd. v. Sync Research, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 103 F. Supp. 2d 1209 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 January 2000 |
| Takeda v. Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 67 F. Supp. 2d 1129 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 May 1999 |
| In Re Rational Software Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 28 F. Supp. 2d 562 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 December 1998 |
| Plevy v. Haggerty | Counsel for the plaintiff | 38 F. Supp. 2d 816 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 August 1998 |
| Rivers v. Walt Disney Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 980 F. Supp. 1358 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 August 1997 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP.
The law school on the record is USC Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1994 · 32 years on the roll.
21 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Peter A. Binkow’s license status, bar number #173848, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records