Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Peter J. Eliasberg · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Peter J. Eliasberg is on California’s State Bar roll, #189110, admitted in 1997; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 4 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a civil rights matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #189110 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1997 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Firm | ACLU Of Southern Calif |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davies v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors | Counsel for the plaintiff | 177 F. Supp. 3d 1194 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 April 2016 |
| Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins | Counsel for the appellant | 804 F.3d 1060 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 October 2015 |
| Rodriguez v. Robbins | Counsel for the respondent | 797 F.3d 758 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 2015 |
| William Fitzgerald v. County of Orange | Counsel for the appellant | 570 F. App'x 653 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2014 |
| Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis | Counsel for the appellant | 745 F.3d 963 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2014 |
| Edward Jones v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 555 F. App'x 659 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2014 |
| Benito Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa | Counsel for the appellant | 718 F.3d 800 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 May 2013 |
| Hepting v. AT & T Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 671 F.3d 881 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2011 |
| Rosebrock v. BEITER | Counsel for the plaintiff | 788 F. Supp. 2d 1127 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 26 May 2011 |
| Diouf v. Napolitano | Counsel for the appellant | 634 F.3d 1081 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2011 |
| North Bay Regional Center v. Maldonado | Counsel for the appellant | 50 Cal. 4th 1206 | California Supreme Court | 8 November 2010 |
| La Asociacion De Trabaja-Dores De Lake Forest v. City of Lake Forest | Counsel for the appellant | 624 F.3d 1083 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 2010 |
| Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis | Counsel for the appellant | 400 F. App'x 261 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 2010 |
| In Re Prather | Counsel for the petitioner | 50 Cal. 4th 238 | California Supreme Court | 29 July 2010 |
| Gordon v. City of Moreno Valley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 687 F. Supp. 2d 930 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 August 2009 |
| Rodriguez v. Hayes | Counsel for the appellant | 578 F.3d 1032 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2009 |
| Alejandro Rodriguez v. James Hayes | Counsel for the appellant | 591 F.3d 1105 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2009 |
| Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the appellant | 175 Cal. App. 4th 1396 | California Court of Appeal | 22 July 2009 |
| Villa v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 306 F. App'x 389 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 January 2009 |
| Villa v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 306 F. App'x 389 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 January 2009 |
| Widders v. Furchtenicht | Counsel for the appellant | 167 Cal. App. 4th 769 | California Court of Appeal | 20 October 2008 |
| Christian Research Institute v. Alnor | Counsel for the appellant | 165 Cal. App. 4th 1315 | California Court of Appeal | 13 August 2008 |
| Buono v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the respondent | 527 F.3d 758 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 May 2008 |
| Bernhard v. City of Ontario | Counsel for the respondent | 270 F. App'x 518 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 March 2008 |
| Porter v. Jones | Counsel for the appellant | 518 F.3d 1181 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 March 2008 |
| Cerezo v. Mukasey | Counsel for the petitioner | 512 F.3d 1163 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2008 |
| Buono v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the respondent | 502 F.3d 1069 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 September 2007 |
| Martinez v. Gonzales | Counsel for the petitioner | 504 F. Supp. 2d 887 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 August 2007 |
| Porter v. Bowen | Counsel for the appellant | 496 F.3d 1009 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 2007 |
| Fitzgerald v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 485 F. Supp. 2d 1137 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 April 2007 |
| Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 39 Cal. 4th 1272 | California Supreme Court | 31 August 2006 |
| Trujillo v. City of Ontario | Counsel for the plaintiff | 428 F. Supp. 2d 1094 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 April 2006 |
| JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES | Counsel for the appellant | 444 F.3d 1118 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 April 2006 |
| Weber v. Lockyer | Counsel for the plaintiff | 365 F. Supp. 2d 1119 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 April 2005 |
| Buono v. Norton | Counsel for the plaintiff | 364 F. Supp. 2d 1175 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 8 April 2005 |
| Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino | Counsel for the appellant | 35 Cal. 4th 180 | California Supreme Court | 3 March 2005 |
| Buono v. Norton | Counsel for the respondent | 371 F.3d 543 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 June 2004 |
| GARMENT WORKERS CENTER v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 117 Cal. App. 4th 1156 | California Court of Appeal | 21 April 2004 |
| Southwest Voter Registration Education Project v. Shelley | Counsel for the appellant | 344 F.3d 914 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 2003 |
| Southwest Voter Registration Education Project v. Shelley | Counsel for the appellant | 344 F.3d 913 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 September 2003 |
| Southwest Voter Registration Education Project v. Shelley | Counsel for the appellant | 344 F.3d 882 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 September 2003 |
| Southwest Voter Registration Education Project v. Shelley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 278 F. Supp. 2d 1131 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 August 2003 |
| Porter v. Jones | Counsel for the appellant | 319 F.3d 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 February 2003 |
| Buono v. Norton | Counsel for the plaintiff | 212 F. Supp. 2d 1202 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 July 2002 |
| Burkow v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 119 F. Supp. 2d 1076 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 October 2000 |
| Los Angeles Alliance for Survival v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 224 F.3d 1076 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 September 2000 |
| L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 22 Cal. 4th 352 | California Supreme Court | 2 March 2000 |
| Gritchen v. Collier | Counsel for the plaintiff | 73 F. Supp. 2d 1148 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 October 1999 |
| Bacus v. Palo Verde Unified School District Board of Education | Counsel for the plaintiff | 11 F. Supp. 2d 1192 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 July 1998 |
| League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson | Counsel for the respondent | 131 F.3d 1297 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 1997 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is ACLU Of Southern Calif.
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1997 · 29 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law and Litigation.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Peter J. Eliasberg’s license status, bar number #189110, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Civil Rights in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records