Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Rex S. Heinke · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Rex S. Heinke is on California’s State Bar roll, #66163, admitted in 1975; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 5 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 18 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a bankruptcy matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 18 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #66163 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1975 |
| Law school | Columbia Univ SOL |
| Firm | Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troester v. Starbucks Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 387 F. Supp. 3d 1019 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 April 2019 |
| United States Ex Rel. Welch v. My Left Foot Children's Therapy, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 871 F.3d 791 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 September 2017 |
| Watermill Ventures, Ltd. v. Cappello Capital Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 671 F. App'x 492 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 December 2016 |
| Hannah Fredrickson v. Starbucks Corp | Counsel for the respondent | 840 F.3d 1119 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 November 2016 |
| Burton Way Hotels, Ltd. v. Four Seasons Hotels Limited | Counsel for the appellant | 663 F. App'x 567 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2016 |
| Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young | Counsel for the respondent | 834 F.3d 975 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 August 2016 |
| Troester v. Starbucks Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 680 F. App'x 511 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2016 |
| Gisele Rogers v. Epson America, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 648 F. App'x 717 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 April 2016 |
| California ex rel. Harris v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Counsel for the petitioner | 809 F.3d 491 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 December 2015 |
| William Argueta Pena v. Loretta E. Lynch | Counsel for the petitioner | 804 F.3d 1258 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 2015 |
| Pena v. Lynch | Counsel for the petitioner | 815 F.3d 452 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 2015 |
| Nikhil Jhaveri v. Adt Security Services, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 583 F. App'x 689 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2014 |
| Christopher O'Shea v. Epson America, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 566 F. App'x 605 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2014 |
| Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 744 F.3d 1072 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 December 2013 |
| Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 734 F.3d 871 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2013 |
| Cynthia Flores v. Supervalu, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 509 F. App'x 593 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 February 2013 |
| Paramount Farms International LLC v. Ventilex B.V. | Counsel for the appellant | 500 F. App'x 586 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2012 |
| Native Village of Kivalina v. Exxonmobil Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 696 F.3d 849 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 September 2012 |
| Matthews v. National Football League Management Council | Counsel for the respondent | 688 F.3d 1107 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 2012 |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank v. KB Home Nevada Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 478 F. App'x 398 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 2012 |
| Pom Wonderful LLC v. Welch Foods, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 468 F. App'x 688 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 2012 |
| Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 654 F.3d 958 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 February 2011 |
| Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 636 F.3d 1115 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 February 2011 |
| Johnson v. Gruma Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 614 F.3d 1062 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 2010 |
| Talisman Capital Talon Fund, L v. Rudolf Gunnerman | Counsel for the appellant | 388 F. App'x 715 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 July 2010 |
| World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 606 F.3d 676 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 May 2010 |
| Shaun Nguyen v. Starbucks Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 378 F. App'x 659 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 May 2010 |
| United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. ConocoPhillips Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 593 F.3d 802 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 January 2010 |
| World Wide Rush LLC v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 605 F. Supp. 2d 1088 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 March 2009 |
| Winterrowd v. American General Annuity Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 556 F.3d 815 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 February 2009 |
| World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 563 F. Supp. 2d 1132 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 9 June 2008 |
| Drnek v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 261 F. App'x 50 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2007 |
| Port of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Counsel for the petitioner | 499 F.3d 1016 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 August 2007 |
| Paramount Land Co. v. California Pistachio Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 491 F.3d 1003 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 2007 |
| United Investors Life Insurance v. Waddell & Reed Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 360 F.3d 960 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 February 2004 |
| Rodney Gregory, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Scie, Llc, Dba Epsg Management Services, Lp | Counsel for the respondent | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 795 | California Supreme Court | 27 January 2003 |
| Rodney Gregory, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Scie, Llc, Dba Epsg Management Services, Lp | Counsel for the respondent | 317 F.3d 1050 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 January 2003 |
| Marshall v. Marshall (In Re Marshall) | Counsel for the defendant | 271 B.R. 858 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 December 2001 |
| Los Angeles Times v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the plaintiff | 956 F. Supp. 1530 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 12 November 1996 |
| Bland v. Fessler | Counsel for the appellant | 88 F.3d 729 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 1996 |
| Greenwich Workshop, Inc. v. Timber Creations, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 932 F. Supp. 1210 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 May 1996 |
| Bland v. Fessler | Counsel for the appellant | 79 F.3d 942 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 1996 |
| New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 971 F.2d 302 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 1992 |
| New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 745 F. Supp. 1540 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 September 1990 |
| Newton v. National Broadcasting Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 930 F.2d 662 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 August 1990 |
| Times Mirror Co. v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 873 F.2d 1210 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 April 1989 |
| Joe Hunt v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Itc Productions, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 872 F.2d 289 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 April 1989 |
| Grunenthal Gmbh v. Hotz | Counsel for the respondent | 712 F.2d 421 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 1983 |
| Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 566 F. Supp. 636 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 June 1983 |
| Grunenthal GmbH v. Hotz | Counsel for the defendant | 511 F. Supp. 582 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 8 April 1981 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 2, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at calg.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Columbia University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1975 · 51 years on the roll.
5 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Rex S. Heinke’s license status, bar number #66163, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Bankruptcy in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records