Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Ricardo Echeverria · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Ricardo Echeverria is on California’s State Bar roll, #166049, admitted in 1993; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Claremont, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Insurance and Personal Injury. 33 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Shernoff Bidart Echeverria LLP. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a insurance matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #166049 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1993 |
| Law school | Santa Clara Univ |
| Firm | Shernoff Bidart Echeverria LLP |
| Location | Claremont, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swanson v. Cnty. of Riverside | Counsel for the respondent | 36 Cal. App. 5th 361 | California Court of Appeal | 17 June 2019 |
| Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 5 Cal. 5th 216 | California Supreme Court | 4 June 2018 |
| City of Fullerton v. Ins. Co. of the State of Penn. | Counsel for the appellant | 664 F. App'x 618 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 October 2016 |
| Pierson v. Helmerich & Payne Internat. Drilling Co. CA5 | Counsel for the appellant | 4 Cal. App. 5th 608 | California Court of Appeal | 6 October 2016 |
| Heide Kurtz v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 668 F. App'x 755 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 September 2016 |
| Haering v. Topa Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 244 Cal. App. 4th 725 | California Court of Appeal | 3 February 2016 |
| Terry Blankenbaker v. Progressive Casualty Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 620 F. App'x 579 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2015 |
| Harp v. Converium Insurance (North America), Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 593 F. App'x 686 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 February 2015 |
| Windsor Food Quality Co. v. The Underwriters of Lloyds of London CA4/2 | Counsel for the appellant | 234 Cal. App. 4th 1178 | California Court of Appeal | 6 February 2015 |
| McIntyre v. Colonies-Pacific, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 228 Cal. App. 4th 664 | California Court of Appeal | 31 July 2014 |
| ANDREW GLASSMAN v. CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | Counsel for the appellant | 542 F. App'x 663 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 October 2013 |
| Liberty National Enterprises, L.P. v. Chicago Title Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 217 Cal. App. 4th 62 | California Court of Appeal | 13 June 2013 |
| Bryant v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 502 F. App'x 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2012 |
| Toro-Aire, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company | Counsel for the appellant | 473 F. App'x 708 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2012 |
| MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance Group | Counsel for the plaintiff | 869 F. Supp. 2d 1117 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 April 2012 |
| Feldman v. Illinois Union Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 198 Cal. App. 4th 1495 | California Court of Appeal | 6 September 2011 |
| Abarca v. FRANKLIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT | Counsel for the plaintiff | 813 F. Supp. 2d 1199 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 31 August 2011 |
| Martin v. PacifiCare of California | Counsel for the appellant | 198 Cal. App. 4th 1390 | California Court of Appeal | 31 August 2011 |
| Mission Viejo Emergency Medical Associates v. Beta Healthcare Group | Counsel for the respondent | 197 Cal. App. 4th 1146 | California Court of Appeal | 29 June 2011 |
| Liberty National Enterprises v. Chicago Title Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 194 Cal. App. 4th 839 | California Court of Appeal | 6 April 2011 |
| Abarca v. Franklin County Water District | Counsel for the plaintiff | 761 F. Supp. 2d 1007 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 5 January 2011 |
| Minkler v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America | Counsel for the appellant | 49 Cal. 4th 315 | California Supreme Court | 17 June 2010 |
| Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 47 Cal. 4th 1233 | California Supreme Court | 1 February 2010 |
| Cargill Incorporated v. Progressive Dairy Solutions, I | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 731 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 January 2010 |
| Mintz v. Blue Cross of California | Counsel for the appellant | 172 Cal. App. 4th 1594 | California Court of Appeal | 16 April 2009 |
| Minkler v. Safeco Insurance | Counsel for the appellant | 561 F.3d 1033 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 April 2009 |
| Spangle v. Farmers Insurance Exchange | Counsel for the appellant | 166 Cal. App. 4th 560 | California Court of Appeal | 29 August 2008 |
| Burks v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 160 Cal. App. 4th 1021 | California Court of Appeal | 5 March 2008 |
| De Bruyn v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 158 Cal. App. 4th 1213 | California Court of Appeal | 14 January 2008 |
| Burns v. California Fair Plan Ass'n | Counsel for the appellant | 152 Cal. App. 4th 646 | California Court of Appeal | 25 June 2007 |
| Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance | Counsel for the plaintiff | 480 F. Supp. 2d 1182 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 March 2007 |
| Progressive West Insurance Company v. Simon H. Preciado | Counsel for the respondent | 479 F.3d 1014 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 March 2007 |
| Medeiros v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 146 Cal. App. 4th 1008 | California Court of Appeal | 16 January 2007 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Shernoff Bidart Echeverria LLP.
The law school on the record is Santa Clara University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1993 · 33 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Insurance and Personal Injury.
33 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Claremont, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Ricardo Echeverria’s license status, bar number #166049, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Insurance in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records