Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Richard B. Kendall · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Richard B. Kendall is on California’s State Bar roll, #90072, admitted in 1979; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 13 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #90072 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1979 |
| Law school | USC Law School |
| Firm | Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J-M Manufacturing Co. v. Phillips & Cohen LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 247 Cal. App. 4th 87 | California Court of Appeal | 2 May 2016 |
| Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 545 F. App'x 678 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2013 |
| DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 938 F. Supp. 2d 941 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 April 2013 |
| David Beckham v. Bauer Publishing Company, L.P. | Counsel for the appellant | 507 F. App'x 717 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 February 2013 |
| Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 706 F.3d 1009 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2013 |
| Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 504 F. App'x 582 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2013 |
| Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 679 F.3d 1121 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 May 2012 |
| Blake Williams v. Oberon Media, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 468 F. App'x 768 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 February 2012 |
| CYBERSITTER, LLC v. People's Republic of China | Counsel for the defendant | 805 F. Supp. 2d 958 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 1 August 2011 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the respondent | 560 F.3d 1027 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2009 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the plaintiff | 543 F.3d 1152 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 September 2008 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the respondent | 8 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2554 | California Supreme Court | 29 February 2008 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the respondent | 518 F.3d 658 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 February 2008 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the plaintiff | 530 F. Supp. 2d 1110 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 January 2008 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the respondent | 502 F.3d 859 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 August 2007 |
| Steiner v. American Broadcasting Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 248 F. App'x 780 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 August 2007 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Winter | Counsel for the plaintiff | 645 F. Supp. 2d 841 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 August 2007 |
| Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan Bank | Counsel for the respondent | 465 F.3d 992 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 2006 |
| Clear Channel Outdoor Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 340 F.3d 810 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 2003 |
| Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. v. Bailey | Counsel for the plaintiff | 710 F. Supp. 737 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 April 1989 |
| The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos | Counsel for the plaintiff | 862 F.2d 1355 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 1988 |
| The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, Imelda R. Marcos, Ramon Azurin, Diosdado C. Ordonez and Ancor Holdings, N.V. | Counsel for the respondent | 818 F.2d 1473 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 1987 |
| Ramon Azurin v. William Von Raab, Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs Service | Counsel for the respondent | 792 F.2d 914 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 1986 |
| United States v. George Michael Gwaltney | Counsel for the respondent | 790 F.2d 1378 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 1986 |
| United States v. James Edward Currie | Counsel for the appellant | 682 F.2d 846 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 July 1982 |
| United States v. James Edward Currie | Counsel for the appellant | 667 F.2d 1251 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 1982 |
| United States v. James Carl Scott | Counsel for the respondent | 665 F.2d 874 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 November 1981 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Media & Entertainment: Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at kbkfirm.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is USC Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.
13 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
27 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Richard B. Kendall’s license status, bar number #90072, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records