Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Richard Martin Heimann · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Richard Martin Heimann is on California’s State Bar roll, #63607, admitted in 1975; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 20 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP. Registry record updated 21 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 21 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #63607 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1975 |
| Law school | Georgetown Univ |
| Firm | Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing in San Francisco County
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronica Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank | Counsel for the appellant | 589 F. App'x 824 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 October 2014 |
| Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 944 F. Supp. 2d 819 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 May 2013 |
| In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 289 F.R.D. 555 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 April 2013 |
| Veronica Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Counsel for the respondent | 704 F.3d 712 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 December 2012 |
| Bank of New York Mellon Corp. False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation ex rel. FX Analytics v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 851 F. Supp. 2d 1190 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 30 March 2012 |
| Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 730 F. Supp. 2d 1080 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 August 2010 |
| New Mexico State Investment Council v. United States District Court for Central District of California | Counsel for the petitioner | 250 F. App'x 225 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2007 |
| Knisley v. Network Associates, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 312 F.3d 1123 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 December 2002 |
| Hayes v. Haushalter | Counsel for the respondent | 105 F.3d 469 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 January 1997 |
| Edwards v. A.L. Lease & Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 46 Cal. App. 4th 1029 | California Court of Appeal | 24 June 1996 |
| Webster v. Omnitrition International, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 79 F.3d 776 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 March 1996 |
| Webster v. Omnitrition International, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1419 | California Supreme Court | 4 March 1996 |
| Lundy v. Morgan Stanley & Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 794 F. Supp. 346 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 June 1992 |
| Sedlacek v. Morgan Whitney Trading Group, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 795 F. Supp. 329 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 January 1992 |
| Church v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 137 F.R.D. 294 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 April 1991 |
| Gray v. First Winthrop Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 754 F. Supp. 157 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 November 1990 |
| Gray v. First Winthrop Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 133 F.R.D. 39 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 25 October 1990 |
| Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 722 F. Supp. 579 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 March 1989 |
| Leonard v. Baumer | Counsel for the plaintiff | 122 F.R.D. 251 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 June 1988 |
| Kirkorian v. Borelli | Counsel for the plaintiff | 695 F. Supp. 446 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 6 May 1988 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP.
The law school on the record is Georgetown University Law Center.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1975 · 51 years on the roll.
20 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Richard Martin Heimann’s license status, bar number #63607, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records