Attorney RecordBusiness Law · Los Angeles County
Robert Edward Dugdale · Business Law Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Robert Edward Dugdale is on California’s State Bar roll, #167258, admitted in 1993; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #167258 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1993 |
| Law school | USC Law School |
| Firm | Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 36 Cal. App. 5th 766 | California Court of Appeal | 29 May 2019 |
| United States v. Michael Torres | Counsel for the respondent | 869 F.3d 1089 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 September 2017 |
| United States v. Melvin Martinez-Lopez | Counsel for the respondent | 864 F.3d 1034 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2017 |
| United States v. Yepiz | Counsel for the respondent | 844 F.3d 1070 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2016 |
| United States v. Gregory Krug | Counsel for the respondent | 666 F. App'x 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 December 2016 |
| United States v. Yijun Zhou | Counsel for the respondent | 838 F.3d 1007 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 September 2016 |
| Jose Munoz Santos v. Linda Thomas | Counsel for the respondent | 830 F.3d 987 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2016 |
| United States v. Diaz | Counsel for the respondent | 838 F.3d 968 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2016 |
| United States v. Diaz | Counsel for the respondent | 821 F.3d 1051 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2016 |
| United States v. Paulo Lara | Counsel for the plaintiff | 815 F.3d 605 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 March 2016 |
| United States v. James Lloyd | Counsel for the plaintiff | 807 F.3d 1128 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 December 2015 |
| United States v. Mark Fowlkes | Counsel for the respondent | 804 F.3d 954 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 2015 |
| United States v. Eugene Temkin | Counsel for the appellant | 797 F.3d 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 August 2015 |
| United States v. Clifford Winkles | Counsel for the respondent | 795 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2015 |
| United States v. Huey Carter | Counsel for the respondent | 795 F.3d 947 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2015 |
| United States v. Mario Gonzalez-Corn | Counsel for the respondent | 807 F.3d 989 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 2015 |
| United States v. Maureen Chan | Counsel for the respondent | 792 F.3d 1151 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 July 2015 |
| United States v. Raul Guzman-Ibarez | Counsel for the respondent | 792 F.3d 1094 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2015 |
| United States v. Steven Yamashiro | Counsel for the respondent | 788 F.3d 1231 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 June 2015 |
| United States v. Adam Gardenhire | Counsel for the respondent | 784 F.3d 1277 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 April 2015 |
| United States v. Angela Aguilar | Counsel for the respondent | 782 F.3d 1101 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 April 2015 |
| United States v. Lawrence Shaw | Counsel for the respondent | 781 F.3d 1130 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 March 2015 |
| Jose Santos v. Linda Thomas | Counsel for the respondent | 779 F.3d 1021 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 March 2015 |
| United States v. Galvin Gibson | Counsel for the respondent | 598 F. App'x 487 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 January 2015 |
| United States v. Claudio Dibe | Counsel for the respondent | 776 F.3d 665 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2015 |
| United States v. Fredy Reyes | Counsel for the respondent | 772 F.3d 1152 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2014 |
| United States v. Geary Waters, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 771 F.3d 679 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 November 2014 |
| United States v. Miguel De La Torre-Jimenez | Counsel for the respondent | 771 F.3d 1163 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 November 2014 |
| United States v. Antoine Johnson | Counsel for the respondent | 767 F.3d 815 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 September 2014 |
| United States v. Johnny Casel Nora | Counsel for the respondent | 765 F.3d 1049 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 August 2014 |
| United States v. Mark Fowlkes | Counsel for the respondent | 770 F.3d 748 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2014 |
| United States v. Apel | Counsel for the respondent | 763 F.3d 1088 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2014 |
| United States v. Apel | Counsel for the respondent | 767 F.3d 800 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2014 |
| United States v. Edwin Carr | Counsel for the appellant | 761 F.3d 1068 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2014 |
| United States v. John Daniels | Counsel for the plaintiff | 760 F.3d 920 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2014 |
| United States v. Deondrae Jackson | Counsel for the plaintiff | 754 F.3d 1116 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2014 |
| United States v. Christopher Osinger | Counsel for the respondent | 753 F.3d 939 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2014 |
| United States v. Dennis Emmett | Counsel for the respondent | 749 F.3d 817 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2014 |
| United States v. Doren Ward | Counsel for the respondent | 747 F.3d 1184 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 April 2014 |
| United States v. Melvin Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 545 F. App'x 659 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2013 |
| United States v. Juventino Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 739 F.3d 420 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 September 2013 |
| United States v. Harry Humphries | Counsel for the respondent | 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9609 | California Supreme Court | 29 August 2013 |
| United States v. Harry Humphries | Counsel for the respondent | 728 F.3d 1028 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 August 2013 |
| United States v. Kyle Grasso | Counsel for the respondent | 724 F.3d 1077 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 2013 |
| United States v. Gerald Williams | Counsel for the respondent | 520 F. App'x 617 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2013 |
| United States v. William Ho | Counsel for the respondent | 516 F. App'x 658 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 April 2013 |
| United States v. Rodolfo Trujillo | Counsel for the respondent | 713 F.3d 1003 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 April 2013 |
| United States v. Yale Augustine | Counsel for the respondent | 712 F.3d 1290 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 April 2013 |
| United States v. Thomas Jennings | Counsel for the respondent | 711 F.3d 1144 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 April 2013 |
| United States v. Stephen Rhodes | Counsel for the respondent | 513 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2013 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 2, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at kbkfirm.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is USC Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1993 · 33 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Robert Edward Dugdale’s license status, bar number #167258, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records