Attorney RecordBusiness Law · San Francisco County
Robert Harvey Bunzel · Business Law Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Robert Harvey Bunzel is on California’s State Bar roll, #99395, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law. 14 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Bartko Pavia LLP. Registry record updated 25 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 25 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #99395 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1981 |
| Law school | UC Hastings COL |
| Firm | Bartko Pavia LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Diamond members practicing Business Law in San Francisco County
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Inc. v. Michael Criden | Counsel for the respondent | 696 F. App'x 189 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 June 2017 |
| Environmental Law Foundation v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 235 Cal. App. 4th 307 | California Court of Appeal | 17 March 2015 |
| Sutter Health v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 227 Cal. App. 4th 1546 | California Court of Appeal | 21 July 2014 |
| Vectren Communications Services, Inc. v. City of Alameda Ex Rel. Alameda Power & Telecom | Counsel for the appellant | 536 F. App'x 681 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2013 |
| Advanced Microtherm, Inc. v. Norman Wright Mechanical Equipment Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 525 F. App'x 612 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 May 2013 |
| Shaffer v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH | Counsel for the petitioner | 779 F. Supp. 2d 1085 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 1 April 2011 |
| Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | Counsel for the respondent | 133 Cal. App. 4th 658 | California Court of Appeal | 19 October 2005 |
| Deutsch v. Turner Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 324 F.3d 692 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2003 |
| Deutsch v. Turner Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 317 F.3d 1005 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 2003 |
| Weeks v. Baker & McKenzie | Counsel for the appellant | 63 Cal. App. 4th 1128 | California Court of Appeal | 4 May 1998 |
| Shahvar v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 25 Cal. App. 4th 653 | California Court of Appeal | 2 June 1994 |
| Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, Electronic Valet Systems, Inc., David Lohrey, Nathan Pang | Counsel for the appellant | 984 F.2d 1015 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 January 1993 |
| Stanton Road Associates v. Lohrey Enterprises, Electronic Valet Systems, Inc., David Lohrey, Nathan Pang | Counsel for the appellant | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 654 | California Supreme Court | 28 January 1993 |
| Estate of Silme G. Domingo v. Republic of the Philippines, Appeal of Ferdinand E. Marcos | Counsel for the appellant | 808 F.2d 1349 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 January 1987 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Bartko Pavia LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at bartkopavia.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law.
14 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
Confirm Robert Harvey Bunzel’s license status, bar number #99395, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records