Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Robin Meadow · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Robin Meadow is on California’s State Bar roll, #51126, admitted in 1972; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Appellate Law. 43 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #51126 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1972 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Padda v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 25 Cal. App. 5th 25 | California Court of Appeal | 11 June 2018 |
| Wilson v. S. Cal. Edison Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 21 Cal. App. 5th 786 | California Court of Appeal | 26 March 2018 |
| Kanno v. Marwit Capital Partners II, L.P. | Counsel for the respondent | 18 Cal. App. 5th 987 | California Court of Appeal | 22 December 2017 |
| William McGrane v. Howrey LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 698 F. App'x 881 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 June 2017 |
| Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney Pictures | Counsel for the appellant | 10 Cal. App. 5th 56 | California Court of Appeal | 22 March 2017 |
| Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 8 Cal. App. 5th 1271 | California Court of Appeal | 27 February 2017 |
| Rice v. Downs | Counsel for the appellant | 248 Cal. App. 4th 175 | California Court of Appeal | 1 June 2016 |
| Sheridan v. Touchstone Television Productions, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 241 Cal. App. 4th 508 | California Court of Appeal | 20 October 2015 |
| Radin v. Jewish National Fund | Counsel for the appellant | 61 Cal. 4th 871 | California Supreme Court | 27 July 2015 |
| Novak v. Fay | Counsel for the appellant | 236 Cal. App. 4th 329 | California Court of Appeal | 28 April 2015 |
| Wilson v. Southern California Edison Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 234 Cal. App. 4th 123 | California Court of Appeal | 9 February 2015 |
| Cardinale v. Miller | Counsel for the appellant | 222 Cal. App. 4th 1020 | California Court of Appeal | 8 January 2014 |
| Gonzalez v. Downtown LA Motors CA2/2 | Counsel for the appellant | 215 Cal. App. 4th 36 | California Court of Appeal | 6 March 2013 |
| Language Line Services, Inc. v. Language Services Associates, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 500 F. App'x 678 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2012 |
| Celador International, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 499 F. App'x 721 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2012 |
| Shahinian v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Counsel for the appellant | 194 Cal. App. 4th 987 | California Court of Appeal | 27 April 2011 |
| Behr v. Redmond | Counsel for the appellant | 193 Cal. App. 4th 517 | California Court of Appeal | 2 March 2011 |
| Greenspan v. LADT LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 191 Cal. App. 4th 486 | California Court of Appeal | 30 December 2010 |
| Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Tabari | Counsel for the respondent | 610 F.3d 1171 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 July 2010 |
| Greenspan v. LADT, LLC | Counsel for the respondent | 185 Cal. App. 4th 1413 | California Court of Appeal | 25 June 2010 |
| Lockton v. O'ROURKE | Counsel for the respondent | 184 Cal. App. 4th 1051 | California Court of Appeal | 23 April 2010 |
| Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 180 Cal. App. 4th 980 | California Court of Appeal | 29 December 2009 |
| Cleveland v. Internet Specialties West, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 171 Cal. App. 4th 24 | California Court of Appeal | 11 February 2009 |
| Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP | Counsel for the appellant | 44 Cal. 4th 937 | California Supreme Court | 7 August 2008 |
| Siebel v. Mittlesteadt | Counsel for the appellant | 41 Cal. 4th 735 | California Supreme Court | 16 July 2007 |
| Said v. Jegan | Counsel for the appellant | 146 Cal. App. 4th 1375 | California Court of Appeal | 23 January 2007 |
| Virtanen v. O'CONNELL | Counsel for the appellant | 140 Cal. App. 4th 688 | California Court of Appeal | 19 June 2006 |
| Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones | Counsel for the appellant | 138 Cal. App. 4th 1481 | California Court of Appeal | 28 April 2006 |
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shewry | Counsel for the appellant | 137 Cal. App. 4th 964 | California Court of Appeal | 21 March 2006 |
| Godinez v. Schwarzenegger | Counsel for the respondent | 132 Cal. App. 4th 73 | California Court of Appeal | 24 August 2005 |
| Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones | Counsel for the appellant | 33 Cal. 4th 917 | California Supreme Court | 20 October 2004 |
| Weinberg v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 119 Cal. App. 4th 1098 | California Court of Appeal | 28 May 2004 |
| Taiheiyo Cement Corp. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 117 Cal. App. 4th 380 | California Court of Appeal | 30 March 2004 |
| Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 110 Cal. App. 4th 1658 | California Court of Appeal | 7 August 2003 |
| Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 29 Cal. 4th 697 | California Supreme Court | 5 March 2003 |
| Vallely Investments, L.P. v. BancAmerica Commercial Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 88 Cal. App. 4th 816 | California Court of Appeal | 26 April 2001 |
| Hightower v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty. | Counsel for the petitioner | 86 Cal. App. 4th 1415 | California Court of Appeal | 28 February 2001 |
| BGJ Associates, LLC v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 75 Cal. App. 4th 952 | California Court of Appeal | 21 October 1999 |
| 65 Butterfield v. Chicago Title Insurance | Counsel for the respondent | 70 Cal. App. 4th 1047 | California Court of Appeal | 19 March 1999 |
| Batchelder v. Kawamoto | Counsel for the respondent | 147 F.3d 915 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 July 1998 |
| Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 52 Cal. App. 4th 820 | California Court of Appeal | 7 February 1997 |
| Lewis v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 30 Cal. App. 4th 1850 | California Court of Appeal | 30 November 1994 |
| City Equities Anaheim, Ltd. v. Lincoln Plaza Development Co. (In re City Equities Anaheim, Ltd.) | Counsel for the respondent | 22 F.3d 954 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 April 1994 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
Certified specialties
Appellate Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Appellate Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at gmsr.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1972 · 54 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
43 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Robin Meadow’s license status, bar number #51126, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records