Attorney RecordCriminal Defense · Orange County
Robison Dooling Harley, Jr. · Criminal Defense Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Robison Dooling Harley, Jr. is on California’s State Bar roll, #68984, admitted in 1976; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Santa Ana, Orange County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense. Certified by the State Bar as a legal specialist in Criminal Law. 38 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 16 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #68984 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1976 |
| Law school | Temple Univ |
| Firm | Law Office of Robison D Harley, Jr |
| Location | Santa Ana, Orange County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Diaz | Counsel for the appellant | 821 F.3d 1051 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2016 |
| United States v. Diaz | Counsel for the appellant | 838 F.3d 968 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2016 |
| United States v. Luis Rivera | Counsel for the appellant | 546 F. App'x 682 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 November 2013 |
| United States v. Sergio Ramos-Atondo | Counsel for the appellant | 732 F.3d 1113 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 October 2013 |
| United States v. Hares Ahmadzai | Counsel for the appellant | 723 F.3d 1089 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 July 2013 |
| United States v. Eric Mukasa | Counsel for the appellant | 465 F. App'x 631 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 January 2012 |
| United States v. Grant | Counsel for the appellant | 463 F. App'x 695 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 December 2011 |
| United States v. Juan Quintanilla | Counsel for the appellant | 463 F. App'x 615 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2011 |
| United States v. Hilario Sanchez | Counsel for the appellant | 462 F. App'x 698 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2011 |
| United States v. Benjamin Schwarz | Counsel for the appellant | 461 F. App'x 650 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 2011 |
| United States v. Caesar Anderson | Counsel for the appellant | 380 F. App'x 597 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 May 2010 |
| United States v. Francisco Rodriguez | Counsel for the appellant | 357 F. App'x 54 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 November 2009 |
| United States v. Chen | Counsel for the appellant | 357 F. App'x 45 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 November 2009 |
| United States v. Lomeli-Mences | Counsel for the appellant | 333 F. App'x 267 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Lomeli-Mences | Counsel for the appellant | 583 F.3d 599 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Lomeli-Mences | Counsel for the appellant | 333 F. App'x 267 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| United States v. Mizyed | Counsel for the appellant | 328 F. App'x 388 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 June 2009 |
| United States v. Mizyed | Counsel for the appellant | 328 F. App'x 388 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 June 2009 |
| United States v. Lomeli-Mences | Counsel for the appellant | 567 F.3d 501 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 May 2009 |
| United States v. Carteno-Vasquez | Counsel for the appellant | 321 F. App'x 579 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2009 |
| United States v. Carteno-Vasquez | Counsel for the appellant | 321 F. App'x 579 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 April 2009 |
| United States v. Vasquez-Ramos | Counsel for the appellant | 531 F.3d 987 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 June 2008 |
| United States v. Calloway | Counsel for the appellant | 278 F. App'x 743 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 May 2008 |
| United States v. Vasquez-Ramos | Counsel for the appellant | 522 F.3d 914 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 April 2008 |
| United States v. Chavez | Counsel for the appellant | 265 F. App'x 454 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 January 2008 |
| United States v. Suite | Counsel for the appellant | 234 F. App'x 574 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 June 2007 |
| United States v. Carson | Counsel for the appellant | 225 F. App'x 641 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2007 |
| United States v. White | Counsel for the appellant | 184 F. App'x 612 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 2006 |
| United States v. Hammonds | Counsel for the appellant | 146 F. App'x 189 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 October 2005 |
| Wooten v. Castro | Counsel for the appellant | 130 F. App'x 106 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 2005 |
| Tyler v. Lewis | Counsel for the appellant | 120 F. App'x 208 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 February 2005 |
| Smith v. Lamarque | Counsel for the appellant | 111 F. App'x 509 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 October 2004 |
| United States v. Martinez-Almazan | Counsel for the appellant | 101 F. App'x 265 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 June 2004 |
| United States v. Ramirez | Counsel for the appellant | 94 F. App'x 445 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 March 2004 |
| United States v. Lonnie Lillard | Counsel for the appellant | 354 F.3d 850 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 2003 |
| United States v. Lonnie Lillard | Counsel for the appellant | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10339 | California Supreme Court | 2 December 2003 |
| Frank Huizar v. Tom Carey | Counsel for the appellant | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10391 | California Supreme Court | 14 December 2001 |
| Frank Huizar v. Tom Carey | Counsel for the appellant | 273 F.3d 1220 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2001 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Certified specialties
Criminal Law
Certified by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
On the official record
The State Bar of California has certified this attorney as a legal specialist in Criminal Law · a certification held by roughly one California attorney in sixty, and separate from any rating.
The employer on the official record is Law Office of Robison D Harley, Jr.
The law school on the record is Temple University.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1976 · 50 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense.
38 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Santa Ana, in Orange County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, seated at Santa Ana.
Confirm Robison Dooling Harley, Jr.’s license status, bar number #68984, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in Orange County: next on the roll
Orange County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records