Attorney RecordLos Angeles County

Ronald J. Nessim, attorney at Bird Marella et al in Los Angeles, California

Ronald J. Nessim · California Lawyer

Call(310) 201-2100

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Ronald J. Nessim is on California’s State Bar roll, #94208, admitted in 1980; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law and Litigation. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. Registry record updated 13 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 13 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#94208
License statusActive
Admitted1980
Law schoolUniv of Michigan Law Sch
FirmBird Marella et al
LocationLos Angeles, Los Angeles County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitebirdmarella.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Robbins v. SmithCounsel for the appellant411 F. App'x 37U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 December 2010
Citigroup, Inc. v. Pacific Investment Management Co. (In Re Enron Corp.)Counsel for the respondent296 B.R. 505U.S. District Court, Central District of California3 July 2003
Thrifty Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCounsel for the petitioner91 Cal. App. 4th 1070California Court of Appeal24 August 2001
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.Counsel for the respondent23 Cal. 4th 429California Supreme Court9 August 2000
Robbins v. SmithCounsel for the appellant97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7550California Supreme Court23 September 1997
Robbins v. SmithCounsel for the appellant125 F.3d 831U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 September 1997
United States v. Chake G. Kojayan, United States of America v. Hratch Meguerdity KalfayanCounsel for the appellant8 F.3d 1315U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 November 1993
Government of Peru v. JohnsonCounsel for the defendant720 F. Supp. 810U.S. District Court, Central District of California29 June 1989
United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCounsel for the respondent788 F.2d 544U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 May 1986
United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCounsel for the respondent788 F.2d 625U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 April 1986
United States v. Alexander T. ValentineCounsel for the respondent783 F.2d 1413U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 March 1986

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

Third-party recognitions

Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.

Chambers USA 2026, Band 4, Media & Entertainment: Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Bird, Marella, Rhow, Lincenberg, Drooks & Nessim, LLP.

Published source · Methodology

Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.

Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →

Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Bird Marella et al.

A firm or employer website answers at birdmarella.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is University of Michigan Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1980 · 46 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Business Law and Litigation.

11 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Ronald J. Nessim’s license status, bar number #94208, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll

Los Angeles County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records