Attorney RecordLitigation · Los Angeles County
Russell Jay Frackman · Litigation Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Russell Jay Frackman is on California’s State Bar roll, #49087, admitted in 1971; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 47 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Mitchell,Silberberg Et Al. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #49087 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1971 |
| Law school | Columbia Univ SOL |
| Firm | Mitchell,Silberberg Et Al |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fahmy v. Jay-Z | Counsel for the defendant | 788 F. Supp. 2d 1072 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 2 May 2011 |
| Capitol Records, LLC v. Bluebeat, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 765 F. Supp. 2d 1198 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 8 December 2010 |
| Nafal v. Carter | Counsel for the appellant | 388 F. App'x 721 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 July 2010 |
| Lahiri v. Universal Music & Video Distribution Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 606 F.3d 1216 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 June 2010 |
| George Clinton v. Universal Music Group, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 376 F. App'x 780 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2010 |
| A&M Records, Inc. v. John Lamonte | Counsel for the respondent | 366 F. App'x 736 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 February 2010 |
| E.S.S. Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 547 F.3d 1095 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 2008 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Augusto | Counsel for the plaintiff | 558 F. Supp. 2d 1055 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 10 June 2008 |
| Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 508 F.3d 1146 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2007 |
| Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 518 F. Supp. 2d 1197 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 16 October 2007 |
| Lahiri v. Universal Music & Video Distribution, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 513 F. Supp. 2d 1172 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 9 August 2007 |
| Nafal v. Carter | Counsel for the defendant | 540 F. Supp. 2d 1128 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 August 2007 |
| Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 487 F.3d 701 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 May 2007 |
| Debra Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., D/B/A Epic Records, a Delaware Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 448 F.3d 1134 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2006 |
| Debra Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., D/B/A Epic Records, a Delaware Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 6 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4308 | California Supreme Court | 24 May 2006 |
| Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 416 F. Supp. 2d 828 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 February 2006 |
| Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 419 F.3d 1005 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 2005 |
| Weatherly v. Universal Music Publishing Group | Counsel for the respondent | 125 Cal. App. 4th 913 | California Court of Appeal | 13 December 2004 |
| Michael J. Rossi, Dba Internet movies.com v. Motion Picture Association of America Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 391 F.3d 1000 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 December 2004 |
| Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster Ltd. | Counsel for the appellant | 380 F.3d 1154 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 August 2004 |
| Borrego v. BMG U.S. Latin | Counsel for the respondent | 92 F. App'x 572 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 April 2004 |
| 321 Studios v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 307 F. Supp. 2d 1085 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 February 2004 |
| UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Sinnott | Counsel for the plaintiff | 300 F. Supp. 2d 993 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 5 February 2004 |
| Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 294 F. Supp. 2d 1160 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 November 2003 |
| Williams v. UMG Recordings, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 281 F. Supp. 2d 1177 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 August 2003 |
| Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 259 F. Supp. 2d 1029 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 25 April 2003 |
| Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 296 F.3d 894 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 2002 |
| Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6617 | California Supreme Court | 24 July 2002 |
| A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1255 | California Supreme Court | 12 February 2001 |
| A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 239 F.3d 1004 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 February 2001 |
| A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Napster, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 114 F. Supp. 2d 896 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 August 2000 |
| Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton | Counsel for the appellant | 212 F.3d 477 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 May 2000 |
| Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 28 F. Supp. 2d 1120 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 August 1998 |
| A & M Records, Inc. v. General Audio Video Cassettes, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 948 F. Supp. 1449 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 November 1996 |
| MCA Records, Inc. v. Charly Records, Ltd. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 865 F. Supp. 649 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 26 September 1994 |
| Jackson v. Axton | Counsel for the appellant | 25 F.3d 884 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 June 1994 |
| Jackson v. Axton | Counsel for the defendant | 814 F. Supp. 42 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 January 1993 |
| Bmg Music Cbs, Inc. A & M Records, Inc. v. Edmundo Perez, Individually and Dba La Feria Del Disco and La Feria Del Disco No. 1 | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10059 | California Supreme Court | 24 December 1991 |
| Bmg Music Cbs, Inc. A & M Records, Inc. v. Edmundo Perez, Individually and Dba La Feria Del Disco and La Feria Del Disco No. 1 | Counsel for the respondent | 952 F.2d 318 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 December 1991 |
| Gallin v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 230 Cal. App. 3d 541 | California Court of Appeal | 10 May 1991 |
| Newman v. Franchise Tax Board | Counsel for the respondent | 208 Cal. App. 3d 972 | California Court of Appeal | 16 March 1989 |
| United States v. Burreson | Counsel for the respondent | 643 F.2d 1344 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 February 1981 |
| A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Heilman | Counsel for the respondent | 75 Cal. App. 3d 554 | California Court of Appeal | 30 November 1977 |
| Kass v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 431 F. Supp. 1037 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 18 February 1977 |
| Kass v. Young | Counsel for the appellant | 67 Cal. App. 3d 100 | California Court of Appeal | 14 February 1977 |
| Davies v. Krasna | Counsel for the respondent | 14 Cal. 3d 502 | California Supreme Court | 3 June 1975 |
| Goodson-Todman Enterprises, Ltd. v. Kellogg Company | Counsel for the plaintiff | 358 F. Supp. 1245 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 May 1973 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Mitchell,Silberberg Et Al.
The law school on the record is Columbia University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1971 · 55 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Litigation.
47 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Russell Jay Frackman’s license status, bar number #49087, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records