Attorney RecordSan Francisco County

Solomon Benjamin Cera · California Lawyer

Call(415) 977-2230

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Solomon Benjamin Cera is on California’s State Bar roll, #99467, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law, Employment and Litigation. 21 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Cera LLP. Registry record updated 3 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 3 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#99467
License statusActive
Admitted1981
Law schoolUniv of San Francisco
FirmCera LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Diamond members practicing Business Law in San Francisco County

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitecerallp.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Par Investment Partners, L.P. v. Aruba Networks, Inc.Counsel for the appellant681 F. App'x 618U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 March 2017
John Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.Counsel for the appellant606 F. App'x 379U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 June 2015
Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff36 F. Supp. 3d 942U.S. District Court, Northern District of California18 April 2014
Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff931 F. Supp. 2d 959U.S. District Court, Northern District of California14 March 2013
Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc.Counsel for the appellant168 F. App'x 836U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 February 2006
Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Counsel for the appellant353 F.3d 765U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 December 2003
Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCounsel for the appellant316 F.3d 1048U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 January 2003
Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCounsel for the appellant2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 602California Supreme Court21 January 2003
Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff234 F. Supp. 2d 1043U.S. District Court, Northern District of California9 October 2002
Wolfe v. Mattel, Inc.Counsel for the appellant294 F.3d 1201U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 June 2002
Aronson v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff79 F. Supp. 2d 1146U.S. District Court, Northern District of California2 November 1999
Lilley v. CharrenCounsel for the plaintiff936 F. Supp. 708U.S. District Court, Northern District of California23 February 1996
Halkin v. VeriFone Inc.Counsel for the appellant11 F.3d 865U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 November 1993
Roberts v. HeimCounsel for the plaintiff130 F.R.D. 430U.S. District Court, Northern District of California8 March 1990
Roberts v. HeimCounsel for the plaintiff130 F.R.D. 424U.S. District Court, Northern District of California17 November 1989
Roberts v. HeimCounsel for the plaintiff123 F.R.D. 614U.S. District Court, Northern District of California9 December 1988
Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Counsel for the appellant857 F.2d 646U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 September 1988
Schur v. Friedman & Shaftan, P.C.Counsel for the plaintiff123 F.R.D. 611U.S. District Court, Northern District of California17 August 1988
Roberts v. HeimCounsel for the plaintiff130 F.R.D. 416U.S. District Court, Northern District of California14 April 1988
Roberts v. HeimCounsel for the plaintiff670 F. Supp. 1466U.S. District Court, Northern District of California23 March 1987
In Re Itel Securities Litigation. I. Walton Bader, and Bader and Bader v. Itel Corporation, and ClassCounsel for the plaintiff791 F.2d 672U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 June 1986

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Cera LLP.

A firm or employer website answers at cerallp.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is University of San Francisco School of Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Business Law, Employment and Litigation.

21 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Solomon Benjamin Cera’s license status, bar number #99467, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records