Attorney RecordIntellectual Property · San Diego County

Stanley J. Panikowski · Intellectual Property Attorney

Call(619) 699-2643

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Stanley J. Panikowski is on California’s State Bar roll, #224232, admitted in 2003; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Intellectual Property. 14 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 21 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a intellectual property matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 21 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#224232
License statusActive
Admitted2003
Law schoolUniv of Virginia
FirmDLA Piper LLP (US)
LocationSan Diego, San Diego County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Comicmix LLCCounsel for the plaintiff372 F. Supp. 3d 1101U.S. District Court, Southern District of California12 March 2019
Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Comicmix LLCCounsel for the plaintiff300 F. Supp. 3d 1073U.S. District Court, Southern District of California7 December 2017
Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. ComicMix LLCCounsel for the plaintiff256 F. Supp. 3d 1099U.S. District Court, Southern District of California9 June 2017
United State ex rel. Casady v. American International Group, Inc.Counsel for the defendant639 F. App'x 489U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 May 2016
Bauer Bros. v. Nike, Inc.Counsel for the defendant159 F. Supp. 3d 1202U.S. District Court, Southern District of California3 February 2016
City of Oakland v. Loretta E. LynchCounsel for the appellant798 F.3d 1159U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 August 2015
Antranik Baghdassarian v. Ara BaghdassarianCounsel for the defendant552 F. App'x 702U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 January 2014
Klestadt & Winters, LLP v. CangelosiCounsel for the appellant672 F.3d 809U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 March 2012
Ni v. SlocumCounsel for the appellant196 Cal. App. 4th 1636California Court of Appeal30 June 2011
Kirk v. First American Title InsuranceCounsel for the respondent183 Cal. App. 4th 776California Court of Appeal7 April 2010
Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.Counsel for the respondent169 Cal. App. 4th 116California Court of Appeal15 December 2008
Schutte & Koerting, Inc. v. Swett & CrawfordCounsel for the respondent298 F. App'x 613U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 November 2008
Grosset v. WenaasCounsel for the respondent42 Cal. 4th 1100California Supreme Court14 February 2008
Freeman v. Lasky, Haas & CohlerCounsel for the respondent410 F.3d 1180U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 June 2005

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is DLA Piper LLP (US).

The law school on the record is University of Virginia.

Admitted to the California Bar in 2003 · 23 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Intellectual Property.

14 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Stanley J. Panikowski’s license status, bar number #224232, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Intellectual Property in San Diego County: next on the roll

San Diego County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records