Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Steven Jeff Renick · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Steven Jeff Renick is on California’s State Bar roll, #101255, admitted in 1981; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law. 31 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #101255 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1981 |
| Law school | Boston Univ |
| Firm | Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Fin. Distribs. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 35 Cal. App. 5th 179 | California Court of Appeal | 16 April 2019 |
| B.B. v. Cnty. of L. A. | Counsel for the appellant | 25 Cal. App. 5th 115 | California Court of Appeal | 10 July 2018 |
| Qadeer Azam v. Jerry Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 714 F. App'x 663 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 October 2017 |
| Christine Wong v. Ellen Anderson | Counsel for the respondent | 669 F. App'x 461 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 October 2016 |
| Mayall ex rel. H.C. v. USA Water Polo, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 174 F. Supp. 3d 1220 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 30 March 2016 |
| Florentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 612 F. App'x 475 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2015 |
| Florentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 798 F.3d 837 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2015 |
| Takiguchi v. MRI International, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 611 F. App'x 919 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 May 2015 |
| Angelo Dahlia v. Omar Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 735 F.3d 1060 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2013 |
| Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 217 Cal. App. 4th 806 | California Court of Appeal | 2 July 2013 |
| Naoko Ohno v. Yuko Yasuma | Counsel for the appellant | 723 F.3d 984 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 2013 |
| Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. | Counsel for the respondent | 55 Cal. 4th 1148 | California Supreme Court | 31 December 2012 |
| Dahlia v. Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 704 F.3d 1043 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 December 2012 |
| County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 208 Cal. App. 4th 1264 | California Court of Appeal | 28 August 2012 |
| Pollard v. Wackenhut | Counsel for the respondent | 688 F.3d 1053 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 August 2012 |
| Young v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 655 F.3d 1156 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2011 |
| Crowe v. County of San Diego | Counsel for the appellant | 608 F.3d 406 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2010 |
| Crowe v. County of San Diego | Counsel for the appellant | 593 F.3d 841 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2010 |
| Goldstein v. City of Long Beach | Counsel for the defendant | 603 F. Supp. 2d 1242 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 27 February 2009 |
| Wasserman v. Chino Valley Unified School District | Counsel for the respondent | 283 F. App'x 527 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2008 |
| Goldstein v. City of Long Beach | Counsel for the appellant | 481 F.3d 1170 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 March 2007 |
| Grosso v. Miramax Film Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 383 F.3d 965 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 September 2004 |
| Grosso v. Miramax Films Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 94 F. App'x 586 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 April 2004 |
| Zelig v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 27 Cal. 4th 1112 | California Supreme Court | 20 May 2002 |
| Leonard R. Milstein v. Stephen L. Cooley Robert B. Foltz Countyof Los Angeles, Opinion | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6092 | California Supreme Court | 20 July 2001 |
| Leonard R. Milstein v. Stephen L. Cooley Robert B. Foltz Countyof Los Angeles, Opinion | Counsel for the respondent | 257 F.3d 1004 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2001 |
| Cruz v. Briseno | Counsel for the respondent | 22 Cal. 4th 568 | California Supreme Court | 23 March 2000 |
| Paul L. Gabbert v. David Conn Carol Najera Leslie Zoeller Elliot Oppenheim | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9130 | California Supreme Court | 8 December 1997 |
| Paul L. Gabbert v. David Conn Carol Najera Leslie Zoeller Elliot Oppenheim | Counsel for the respondent | 131 F.3d 793 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 December 1997 |
| Estate of Blue v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5741 | California Supreme Court | 21 July 1997 |
| Estate of Blue v. County of Los Angeles | Counsel for the respondent | 120 F.3d 982 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 July 1997 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester.
A firm or employer website answers at manningkass.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is Boston University.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1981 · 45 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law.
31 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Steven Jeff Renick’s license status, bar number #101255, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records