Attorney RecordLitigation · San Francisco County

Susan J Harriman · Litigation Attorney

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Susan J Harriman is on California’s State Bar roll, #111703, admitted in 1983; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 16 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#111703
License statusActive
Admitted1983
Law schoolUC Hastings COL
FirmKeker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Diamond members practicing Litigation in San Francisco County

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitekeker.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
In re ButlerCounsel for the petitioner4 Cal. 5th 728California Supreme Court2 April 2018
Robin Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.Counsel for the respondent841 F.3d 1062U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 November 2016
Javorsky v. Western Athletic Clubs, Inc.Counsel for the respondent242 Cal. App. 4th 1386California Court of Appeal11 December 2015
Renewable Resources Coalition, Inc. v. Pebble Mines Corp.Counsel for the appellant218 Cal. App. 4th 384California Court of Appeal30 July 2013
Tabitha Totah v. Lucasfilm Entertainment Co.Counsel for the respondent500 F. App'x 573U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 November 2012
Kiran Pande v. Chevrontexaco CorporationCounsel for the respondent359 F. App'x 769U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 November 2009
Spinosa v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCounsel for the respondent339 F. App'x 754U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 July 2009
Spinosa v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCounsel for the respondent339 F. App'x 754U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 July 2009
Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCounsel for the appellant162 Cal. App. 4th 858California Court of Appeal30 April 2008
City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.Counsel for the appellant43 Cal. 4th 375California Supreme Court24 April 2008
Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.Counsel for the appellant151 Cal. App. 4th 688California Court of Appeal30 May 2007
Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. QuackenbushCounsel for the respondent64 Cal. App. 4th 1473California Court of Appeal10 July 1998
Carl E. Berg v. Hayden Leason Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe Paul AlexanderCounsel for the respondent32 F.3d 422U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 September 1994
Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.Counsel for the respondent7 Cal. 4th 1California Supreme Court28 January 1994
Kaufman and Broad-South Bay v. Unisys Corp.Counsel for the defendant822 F. Supp. 1468U.S. District Court, Northern District of California7 May 1993
Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. LungrenCounsel for the plaintiff809 F. Supp. 747U.S. District Court, Northern District of California23 December 1992

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP.

The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1983 · 43 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Litigation.

16 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Susan J Harriman’s license status, bar number #111703, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Litigation in San Francisco County: next on the roll

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records