Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr · California Lawyer
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr is on California’s State Bar roll, #132099, admitted in 1987; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 7 practice areas are listed in the registry, shown on this page. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #132099 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1987 |
| Law school | Univ of San Diego |
| Firm | Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. | Counsel for the respondent | 908 F.3d 476 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 November 2018 |
| City of Oakland v. BP P.L.C. | Counsel for the defendant | 325 F. Supp. 3d 1017 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 25 June 2018 |
| Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 302 F. Supp. 3d 1071 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 February 2018 |
| Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Servs., Inc. v. Caremark Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 322 F. Supp. 3d 1027 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 January 2018 |
| Ridgeway v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 269 F. Supp. 3d 975 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 September 2017 |
| Parrish v. Latham & Watkins | Counsel for the respondent | 3 Cal. 5th 767 | California Supreme Court | 10 August 2017 |
| Gugliuzza v. Federal Trade Commission | Counsel for the appellant | 852 F.3d 884 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 2017 |
| Association of California Insurance Companies v. Jones | Counsel for the respondent | 2 Cal. 5th 376 | California Supreme Court | 23 January 2017 |
| Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 235 F. Supp. 3d 1132 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 20 January 2017 |
| Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 7 Cal. App. 5th 276 | California Court of Appeal | 6 January 2017 |
| Augustus v. ABM Security Services | Counsel for the appellant | 2 Cal. 5th 257 | California Supreme Court | 22 December 2016 |
| Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County | Counsel for the respondent | 1 Cal. 5th 1132 | California Supreme Court | 1 December 2016 |
| Lubin v. Wackenhut Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 5 Cal. App. 5th 926 | California Court of Appeal | 21 November 2016 |
| Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 848 F.3d 1201 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 September 2016 |
| Abdul Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 836 F.3d 1102 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 September 2016 |
| David Gelber v. Toyota Motor Corp | Counsel for the respondent | 668 F. App'x 765 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2016 |
| O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 201 F. Supp. 3d 1110 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 August 2016 |
| Nisha Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 651 F. App'x 672 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 2016 |
| Vergara v. State of California | Counsel for the respondent | 246 Cal. App. 4th 619 | California Court of Appeal | 14 April 2016 |
| Vergara v. State | Counsel for the respondent | 209 Cal. Rptr. 3d 532 | California Supreme Court | 14 April 2016 |
| Tan v. Grubhub, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 171 F. Supp. 3d 998 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 March 2016 |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 642 F. App'x 680 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 March 2016 |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 815 F.3d 593 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 March 2016 |
| Randolph Bachrach v. Covenant Transporation | Counsel for the respondent | 636 F. App'x 404 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2016 |
| He Nam You v. Japan | Counsel for the defendant | 150 F. Supp. 3d 1140 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 December 2015 |
| O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 150 F. Supp. 3d 1095 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 December 2015 |
| O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 311 F.R.D. 547 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 9 December 2015 |
| Marley Castro v. Abm Industries Incorporated | Counsel for the appellant | 616 F. App'x 353 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 September 2015 |
| Bain v. California Teachers Ass'n | Counsel for the plaintiff | 156 F. Supp. 3d 1142 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 September 2015 |
| Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C. | Counsel for the respondent | 61 Cal. 4th 988 | California Supreme Court | 10 August 2015 |
| Soto v. Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. CA2/4 | Counsel for the appellant | 239 Cal. App. 4th 165 | California Court of Appeal | 15 July 2015 |
| Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 109 F. Supp. 3d 1259 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 June 2015 |
| Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 109 F. Supp. 3d 1185 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 9 June 2015 |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corp v. Safeco Insurance Co of America | Counsel for the appellant | 605 F. App'x 609 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 March 2015 |
| E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Proximo Spirits, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 583 F. App'x 632 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 July 2014 |
| Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKay | Counsel for the appellant | 742 F.3d 860 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 January 2014 |
| Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 58 Cal. 4th 329 | California Supreme Court | 19 December 2013 |
| Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA | Counsel for the appellant | 221 Cal. App. 4th 867 | California Court of Appeal | 26 November 2013 |
| In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 978 F. Supp. 2d 1053 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 October 2013 |
| Perry v. Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 725 F.3d 1140 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 2013 |
| Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 964 F. Supp. 2d 1115 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 August 2013 |
| Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 218 Cal. App. 4th 96 | California Court of Appeal | 23 July 2013 |
| Perry v. Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 725 F.3d 968 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 June 2013 |
| Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 705 F.3d 1122 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 January 2013 |
| Don Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Rysher Entertainment | Counsel for the appellant | 209 Cal. App. 4th 919 | California Court of Appeal | 1 October 2012 |
| Aidan Ming-Ho Leung v. Verdugo Hills Hospital | Counsel for the appellant | 55 Cal. 4th 291 | California Supreme Court | 23 August 2012 |
| Kristin Perry v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 681 F.3d 1065 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2012 |
| Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 53 Cal. 4th 1004 | California Supreme Court | 12 April 2012 |
| In re Live Concert Antitrust Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 863 F. Supp. 2d 966 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 23 March 2012 |
| In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 838 F. Supp. 2d 967 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 12 March 2012 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
Third-party recognitions
Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Appellate Law (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, First Amendment Litigation (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Star Individuals, Litigation: Appellate (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 1, Media & Entertainment: First Amendment Litigation (California). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Chambers USA 2026, Band 3, Product Liability & Mass Torts (USA - Nationwide). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Published source · Methodology
Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.
Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →
Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at gibsondunn.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of San Diego School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1987 · 39 years on the roll.
7 practice areas are on the record, listed on this page.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
Confirm Theodore J. Boutrous Jr’s license status, bar number #132099, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records
