Attorney RecordImmigration
Thomas Mark Bondy · Immigration Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Thomas Mark Bondy is on California’s State Bar roll, #121785, admitted in 1985; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Washington. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Immigration. 26 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 6 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a immigration matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 6 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #121785 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1985 |
| Law school | Univ of California at Los Angeles |
| Location | Washington |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levin v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 718 F.3d 1110 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 2013 |
| City of Redding v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | Counsel for the petitioner | 693 F.3d 828 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 August 2012 |
| United States v. State of Arizona | Counsel for the respondent | 689 F.3d 1132 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 August 2012 |
| McMurray v. Verizon Communications, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 669 F.3d 928 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2011 |
| VALADEZ-LOPEZ v. Chertoff | Counsel for the respondent | 656 F.3d 851 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2011 |
| Ford v. National Credit Union Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 448 F. App'x 745 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 2011 |
| Deborah Rutledge v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 417 F. App'x 635 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2011 |
| Kristen Burnham v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 400 F. App'x 190 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2010 |
| Baochang Zhou v. Holder | Counsel for the respondent | 331 F. App'x 520 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2009 |
| Baochang Zhou v. Holder | Counsel for the respondent | 331 F. App'x 520 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 August 2009 |
| Gutierrez v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 323 F. App'x 493 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2009 |
| Gutierrez v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 323 F. App'x 493 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2009 |
| Haile v. Mukasey | Counsel for the respondent | 303 F. App'x 510 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 2008 |
| Haile v. Mukasey | Counsel for the respondent | 303 F. App'x 510 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 2008 |
| Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. Bush | Counsel for the appellant | 507 F.3d 1190 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 November 2007 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 190 F. App'x 580 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 July 2006 |
| Singh v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 180 F. App'x 723 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2006 |
| Rus v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 180 F. App'x 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 May 2006 |
| Avalos-Galvan v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 170 F. App'x 501 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2006 |
| Reddy v. State | Counsel for the respondent | 97 F. App'x 767 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 2004 |
| GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the appellant | 139 F.3d 1280 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 March 1998 |
| GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the appellant | 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2236 | California Supreme Court | 27 March 1998 |
| Berger v. Hanlon | Counsel for the respondent | 129 F.3d 505 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 November 1997 |
| Robert F. BURTCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee | Counsel for the respondent | 120 F.3d 1087 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 1997 |
| Robert F. BURTCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6488 | California Supreme Court | 15 August 1997 |
| Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 47 F.3d 990 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 February 1995 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is UCLA School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1985 · 41 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Immigration.
26 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Washington, DC, outside California; the California licence is unaffected by where the attorney keeps an office.
Confirm Thomas Mark Bondy’s license status, bar number #121785, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records