Attorney RecordLos Angeles County

Vince L. Farhat · California Lawyer

Call(310) 785-5382

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Vince L. Farhat is on California’s State Bar roll, #183794, admitted in 1996; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 19 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Jeffer Mangels & Mitchell LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#183794
License statusActive
Admitted1996
Law schoolLoyola Law School
FirmJeffer Mangels & Mitchell LLP
LocationLos Angeles, Los Angeles County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websitejeffer.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
United States Ex Rel. Bennett v. Biotronik, Inc.Counsel for the respondent876 F.3d 1011U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 December 2017
United States v. McPetersCounsel for the plaintiff333 F. App'x 275U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 September 2009
United States v. McPetersCounsel for the plaintiff333 F. App'x 275U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 September 2009
United States v. KirchmeierCounsel for the respondent337 F. App'x 728U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 July 2009
United States v. KirchmeierCounsel for the respondent337 F. App'x 728U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 July 2009
United States v. OhonmeCounsel for the respondent302 F. App'x 706U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 December 2008
United States v. JoshuaCounsel for the respondent298 F. App'x 696U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 November 2008
United States v. Jimenez-CarrilloCounsel for the respondent249 F. App'x 582U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 September 2007
Kohl v. PotterCounsel for the respondent225 F. App'x 582U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 March 2007
Martinez v. LockyerCounsel for the respondent453 F. Supp. 2d 1150U.S. District Court, Central District of California30 August 2006
Doyle v. WardenCounsel for the respondent447 F. Supp. 2d 1123U.S. District Court, Central District of California17 August 2006
Mann v. BarnhartCounsel for the respondent175 F. App'x 159U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 April 2006
Mann v. BarnhartCounsel for the respondent175 F. App'x 159U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 April 2006
Macias-Ramos v. SchiltgenCounsel for the respondent87 F. App'x 57U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 January 2004
Pure Power! Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCounsel for the defendant83 F. App'x 901U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 December 2003
Corbeil v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent81 F. App'x 662U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 November 2003
Corbeil v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent81 F. App'x 215U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 November 2003
Marlon Bramwell v. U.S. Bureau of PrisonsCounsel for the respondent348 F.3d 804U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 October 2003
Marlon Bramwell v. U.S. Bureau of PrisonsCounsel for the respondent2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9329California Supreme Court27 October 2003

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Jeffer Mangels & Mitchell LLP.

A firm or employer website answers at jeffer.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1996 · 30 years on the roll.

19 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Vince L. Farhat’s license status, bar number #183794, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Los Angeles County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records