Attorney RecordEmployment · Alameda County
David A. Rosenfeld · Employment Attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
David A. Rosenfeld is on California’s State Bar roll, #58163, admitted in 1973; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Emeryville, Alameda County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Employment. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a employment matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 11 filed matters on the registry.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
1 finding about you awaits your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #58163 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1973 |
| Law school | Univ of California Berkeley |
| Firm | Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld |
| Location | Emeryville, Alameda County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho | Counsel for the respondent | 8 Cal. 5th 111 | California Supreme Court | 29 August 2019 |
| Marquez v. City of Long Beach | Counsel for the appellant | 32 Cal. App. 5th 552 | California Court of Appeal | 25 February 2019 |
| Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Ass'n of Bridge | Counsel for the respondent | 891 F.3d 1182 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 2018 |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union | Counsel for the appellant | 4 Cal. App. 5th 194 | California Court of Appeal | 14 October 2016 |
| Installit, Inc. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board | Counsel for the defendant | 214 F. Supp. 3d 855 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 October 2016 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Union Local No. 70 | Counsel for the respondent | 668 F. App'x 283 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 August 2016 |
| Walmart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Int'l Union | Counsel for the appellant | 204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 266 | California Supreme Court | 30 June 2016 |
| Jerome Clay, Jr. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company | Counsel for the defendant | 639 F. App'x 420 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 January 2016 |
| National Labor Relations Board Ex Rel. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 805 F.3d 1155 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 November 2015 |
| Bain v. California Teachers Ass'n | Counsel for the defendant | 156 F. Supp. 3d 1142 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 September 2015 |
| International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employee & Moving Picture Technicians, Artist, & Allied Crafts of the United States v. InSync Show Productions, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 801 F.3d 1033 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 September 2015 |
| Godfrey v. Oakland Port Services Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 230 Cal. App. 4th 1267 | California Court of Appeal | 28 October 2014 |
| Corns v. Laborers International Union | Counsel for the defendant | 62 F. Supp. 3d 1105 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 July 2014 |
| County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission | Counsel for the respondent | 56 Cal. 4th 905 | California Supreme Court | 30 May 2013 |
| Bluford v. Safeway Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 216 Cal. App. 4th 864 | California Court of Appeal | 8 May 2013 |
| SEIU, United Healthcare Workers-West v. Centinela Hospital Medical Center | Counsel for the appellant | 525 F. App'x 533 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2013 |
| Gallardo v. AT & T Mobility, LLC | Counsel for the plaintiff | 937 F. Supp. 2d 1128 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 March 2013 |
| Rudy Lemus v. Burnham Painting & Drywall Cor | Counsel for the appellant | 426 F. App'x 543 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 April 2011 |
| Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC v. Department of Industrial Relations | Counsel for the respondent | 194 Cal. App. 4th 538 | California Court of Appeal | 24 March 2011 |
| Garcia v. SACRAMENTO COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., INC. | Counsel for the respondent | 733 F. Supp. 2d 1201 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 20 August 2010 |
| McCarther v. Pacific Telesis Group | Counsel for the appellant | 48 Cal. 4th 104 | California Supreme Court | 18 February 2010 |
| Smith v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co., Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 662 F. Supp. 2d 1199 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 12 August 2009 |
| Smith v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 649 F. Supp. 2d 1073 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 12 August 2009 |
| Laborers International Union of North America, Local 872 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 323 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2009 |
| Laborers International Union of North America, Local 872 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 323 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2009 |
| Hailstone v. Martinez | Counsel for the appellant | 169 Cal. App. 4th 728 | California Court of Appeal | 23 December 2008 |
| California Pacific Medical Center v. Service Employees International Union | Counsel for the appellant | 300 F. App'x 471 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 November 2008 |
| United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America Local 586 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 540 F.3d 957 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2008 |
| Fresh Fruit & Vegetable Workers Local 1096 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 539 F.3d 1089 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2008 |
| National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1036 | Counsel for the respondent | 267 F. App'x 658 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 2008 |
| International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 845 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 265 F. App'x 547 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 January 2008 |
| International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 253 F. App'x 625 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 2007 |
| East Bay Automotive Council v. Q&S Automotive, LLC | Counsel for the appellant | 255 F. App'x 105 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 October 2007 |
| American Federation of Labor v. Chertoff | Counsel for the plaintiff | 552 F. Supp. 2d 999 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 October 2007 |
| District Council No. 16 of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers, Local 1621 V. B & B Glass, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 510 F.3d 851 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 August 2007 |
| District Council No. 16 of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers, Local 1621 v. B & B Glass, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 498 F.3d 926 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 2007 |
| Savaglio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 149 Cal. App. 4th 588 | California Court of Appeal | 9 April 2007 |
| Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 v. Newmont Mining Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 476 F.3d 690 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 February 2007 |
| Calvert v. County of Yuba | Counsel for the appellant | 145 Cal. App. 4th 613 | California Court of Appeal | 5 December 2006 |
| Carpenters Union Local No. 1109 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 209 F. App'x 692 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 December 2006 |
| Helix Electric Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement | Counsel for the respondent | 203 F. App'x 813 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 October 2006 |
| Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 463 F.3d 909 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 September 2006 |
| Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers International Union, Local 37 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 185 F. App'x 691 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2006 |
| Machinists District Lodge No. 190, Local Lodge 1584, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 185 F. App'x 581 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 June 2006 |
| Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board | Counsel for the petitioner | 441 F.3d 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 March 2006 |
| Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 133 Cal. App. 4th 949 | California Court of Appeal | 27 October 2005 |
| Mauricio v. International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades | Counsel for the respondent | 81 F. App'x 958 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 November 2003 |
| Collins v. Overnite Transportation Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 105 Cal. App. 4th 171 | California Court of Appeal | 3 February 2003 |
| Dahl v. Rosenfeld | Counsel for the appellant | 316 F.3d 1074 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2003 |
| Public Citizen v. Department of Transportation | Counsel for the petitioner | 316 F.3d 1002 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 January 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld.
The law school on the record is UC Berkeley School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1973 · 53 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Employment.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Emeryville, in Alameda County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, seated at Oakland.
Confirm David A. Rosenfeld’s license status, bar number #58163, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Employment in Alameda County: next on the roll
Alameda County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records